Notes, screenshots, references, and PM artifacts become structured, usable signal — much faster than manual synthesis alone.
Turning ambiguous problems into shipped product across fintech, lending, and growth.
I'm a PM with 4+ years across Angel One, LiquiLoans, and Nexgen. I work best when the problem is messy — find the real constraint, define the system, align the teams, and ship the metric that moves the business.
Sharper output, less noise, and more room for actual product thinking. AI handles the heavy lifting; the calls that matter stay with me.
Notes, screenshots, references, and PM artifacts become structured, usable signal — much faster than manual synthesis alone.
PRDs, lifecycle copy, and PM narratives reach a stronger first version sooner. I sharpen, restructure, and tighten — AI just gets me past the blank page.
More UI options, more messaging angles, and more experiment framings tested early — so the final path is chosen against real alternatives, not the first idea.
The short version for a recruiter or hiring manager: I do my best work in high-ambiguity product environments where the job is to find the real constraint, align the teams, and move the business metric that matters.
I’m a Product Strategist / PM with 4+ years across fintech, digital lending, growth, and lifecycle systems. The pattern across my work is consistent: find the real constraint, define the system, align the teams, and ship something that moves the business.
Currently at Angelone Limited, I work on lending product strategy. Before that, I built digital lending and growth muscle across LiquiLoans and Nexgen, with strong exposure to funnel diagnosis, experimentation, lifecycle design, and execution discipline.
The progression is clear: start with acquisition and experimentation, deepen into lending execution and systems, then move into strategy, launch ownership, and lifecycle leverage.
Diagnose with data, align with teams, draft with clarity, and ship with cross-functional partners. The stack reflects how the work actually moves.
Tap a result to see what changed, why it mattered, and how the work evolved across roles.
Built the personal loan motion from scratch, aligned the operating model, and turned a fragile early journey into a repeatable business system.
From acquisition and growth systems to lending launches, lifecycle engines, and strategic product ownership.
Built acquisition and landing-page experimentation muscle across search, messaging, and conversion flows.
SEO + funnel testingMoved into digital lending product work with behavioural segmentation, disbursal growth, and tighter execution systems.
133% disbursal growthOwned the launch system across callbacks, partner coordination, documentation, and funnel movement.
410+ Cr in 90 daysLayering lifecycle systems, prioritisation frameworks, and product judgment on top of execution-heavy PM work.
+12.4pp utilisationFour projects. Each one has a clear constraint, a measurable result, and a decision I owned.
Took PL from zero to a live lending motion — PRD, partner plumbing, and XFN alignment from day one.
Segmented users by repayment signals and tied decisioning to cohorts — improving approval quality and disbursal velocity.
Built a CleverTap system that nudged approved-but-inactive users toward utilisation through state-based segments, not blast campaigns.
Rebuilt content architecture around high-intent search clusters. Reduced paid dependence while lifting qualified top-of-funnel.
I included this section because I want a hiring team to see judgment, not just wins. Some of the strongest product calls are the ones you kill early for the right reason.
The idea looked engaging on paper, but user conversations made it clear the tone landed badly.
For users under financial stress, the mechanic felt condescending instead of supportive.
Hypothesis: short educational explainers would improve confidence and reduce drop-off.
A/B result: 0% lift on activation, 4% session drop. Users wanted speed, not extra reading.
Tempting growth idea — surfacing a pre-approved amount early could increase click-through.
But it introduced RBI disclosure obligations and expectation-management risk before validation checks.
Not as a keyword checklist, but as the mix of growth, technical, analytical, and execution strengths I bring most consistently.
Funnels, onboarding, conversion — fastest area of impact.
Friction removal across acquisition to disbursal flows.
State-based CRM systems, not blast campaigns.
PL, LAS, P2P, NBFC — credit decisioning and unit economics.
Two products taken from zero to live, with GTM ownership.
SQL, BigQuery, metric trees, cohort diagnosis.
Driving releases across eng, risk, compliance, ops, analytics.
RICE, JTBD, North Star — turning ambiguity into roadmaps.
Test design, segmentation, and reusable readout frameworks.
Pre-reads, exec alignment, and upward communication.
PRDs, API specs, webhooks, event instrumentation.
Backlog health, sprint planning, QA without process theatre.
These credentials complement the on-the-job work by sharpening the frameworks I use in strategy, markets, growth, and product execution.
Each credential is included with context, so it reads less like a badge wall and more like evidence of product judgment, market fluency, and execution discipline.
Formal training in strategic roadmapping, feature prioritisation, and end-to-end product delivery using the Aha! framework.
Practical PLG frameworks covering activation funnels, product-qualified leads, free-to-paid conversion, and self-serve onboarding loops.
Financial markets fundamentals across economics, currencies, fixed income, and equities through Bloomberg Terminal workflows.
Selected as Top Fellow for the strength of product thinking and execution across the full PM fellowship program.
The answers below are the shortest way to understand where I fit best, what kind of teams I work well with, and how I think about the domain.
I am strongest in product strategy, growth PM, lending PM, and lifecycle-heavy roles where the work sits between user journeys, business logic, and execution.
The common thread is that the role needs someone who can diagnose a system, define what to ship, and stay close enough to delivery to make sure the metric actually moves.
I do my best work with teams facing ambiguity, cross-functional complexity, and a real business constraint rather than a cosmetic roadmap problem.
When the path is unclear but the outcome matters, I am comfortable aligning business, engineering, analytics, ops, and design around a practical plan.
Usually the issues are funnel drop-offs, onboarding friction, unclear ownership between teams, weak lifecycle loops, or a launch that needs structure before scale.
I tend to be useful when a business knows something is leaking but needs a PM who can find the bottleneck, frame the tradeoff, and convert it into execution.
Strategy for me is not a deck disconnected from delivery. I start with the metric, the constraint, and the sequencing, then translate that into PRDs, prioritisation, experiments, and cross-functional follow-through.
That keeps the work grounded in something the team can actually ship, measure, and improve instead of just discuss.
Because the work has real weight. In lending, product decisions touch trust, risk, compliance, operations, and revenue at the same time.
I like domains where product choices have operational and commercial consequences, not just surface-level UX implications.
I align business goals, validate feasibility with engineering, and ground decisions in analytics so the team ships what actually moves the metric.
Fintech is where I have built the deepest muscle, but the transferable value is broader: funnel diagnosis, lifecycle design, growth thinking, documentation, and cross-functional execution.
If the product has complexity, measurable outcomes, and real operating constraints, the core way I work carries well beyond one domain.
I use AI as a force multiplier for synthesis, first drafts, and exploring more directions faster, especially across research, PRDs, lifecycle copy, and interface thinking.
The judgment layer stays with me. I do not outsource priorities, tradeoffs, or final decisions to the tool.
I would first understand the company's core metric, map the journey, and identify where growth, activation, delivery, or decision-making is being constrained.
From there I would align on a small number of high-confidence bets, tighten the operating rhythm around them, and make sure the team has the documentation and clarity to execute cleanly.
Probably the mix of structured product thinking and execution depth. I am comfortable zooming out to talk strategy, but I also stay close to callbacks, CRM flows, experiments, specs, and operating gaps.
That means the work usually does not stop at a polished narrative. It gets translated into something teams can build, launch, and learn from.
My standard notice period is 60 days.
If the opportunity is a strong fit, I am open to discussing transition planning and whether an earlier ramp or phased handover is feasible.
If your team has a hard product problem and you want a PM who'll get into the constraint, the data, and the call — I'm open to the conversation.